LEXIS AND COMPANY

  Legal professionals, including lawyers, judges, and others involved in the legal system, often have thoughts and opinions that they may not express openly due to professional decorum, ethical considerations, or the need to maintain impartiality and fairness in their roles. While it's impossible to generalize the inner thoughts of all legal professionals, there are some common thoughts that they may harbor but refrain from vocalizing publicly. Here are some examples: 1. Criticisms of Colleagues: Legal professionals may have private critiques or disagreements with their colleagues' legal strategies, arguments, or professional conduct. They may harbor doubts about the competence, integrity, or ethics of other lawyers or judges but refrain from openly expressing these criticisms to maintain professional relationships and decorum. 2. Frustrations with the Legal System: Despite their commitment to upholding the rule of law, legal professionals may harbor frustrations or criticism

  Juror qualification forms are crucial documents used during the jury selection process to assess the eligibility and suitability of potential jurors for a particular trial. While most jurors complete these forms truthfully and accurately, there are instances where individuals may provide false or misleading information. This can occur for various reasons, ranging from intentional deception to inadvertent mistakes or misunderstandings. Here's a detailed look at the phenomenon of jurors lying on their juror qualification forms, including common reasons and potential consequences: Common Reasons for Lying: Desire to Avoid Jury Duty: One of the most common reasons for jurors to lie on their qualification forms is to avoid serving on a jury. Jury duty can be perceived as inconvenient or burdensome, requiring individuals to take time off from work or other responsibilities. Some jurors may falsely claim hardships or disqualifying factors in an attempt to be excused from jury service.

  Judges becoming frustrated with lawyers and their behavior in a courtroom is not uncommon, as the dynamic between the bench and the bar can sometimes lead to tensions or conflicts. While judges are expected to maintain decorum and impartiality, they may express frustration when lawyers engage in behavior that disrupts proceedings, violates court rules, or fails to meet professional standards. Here are some examples of situations where judges may become frustrated with lawyers: Repeated Interruptions : If a lawyer repeatedly interrupts the judge or opposing counsel during proceedings, it can disrupt the flow of the trial and hinder the administration of justice. Judges expect lawyers to wait their turn to speak and to address the court respectfully. Failure to Follow Court Rules : Judges may become frustrated if lawyers fail to follow court rules or procedures, such as filing deadlines, evidentiary requirements, or formatting guidelines for legal documents. Non-compliance with court r