LEXIS AND COMPANY

  Cybercrime and need for cybersecurity in India  In the following years we have observed that cybercrimes has been increasing throughout the whole world if we look into our own country India there have been 16% increase in the number of cyberattacks as reported by data of police, the increasing cyber crimes are emphasizing towards a strong legal  framework to safeguard the society and also investigating such crimes is a long and complicated process. The investigation perform several task while dealing with such crimes like analyzing the forensic digital data tracking the hackers through their actions and malicious activities for this they require a special kind of software that helps them to gather all information related to the attack. As news of increasing cyberattacks continues to make major headlines across the globe, it’s becoming more and more clear that cybercrime is having an unprecedented impact in every industry and affecting us on a personal level. It’s no wonder why cybers

  Principle of the Doctrine of Legitimacy by Acknowledgement: Whenever the paternity of a child, that is, its legitimate descent from its father, cannot be shown by establishing the marriage between the child's biological parents at the time of the child's conception or birth, the marriage and legitimate descent can be established by "acknowledgement." It is not necessary to announce acknowledgement of paternity. The fact that one person has openly and consistently treated another as if he or she were his or her legitimate kid may be used as evidence of such recognition. For example, as noted by the Privy Council, "it has been decided in various occasions that there is no requirement for proof of an express acceptance, but that an acknowledgement of children by a Muhammadan as his sons may be inferred from his having publicly treated them as such." (Muhammad Azmat v. Lalli Begum, 9 I.A., 1881; Muhammad Azmat v. Lalli Begum, 1881; Muhammad Azmat v. Lalli Begu

 Supreme Court Guidelines on Adoption As previously said, the concept of inter-country adoption is a relatively new concept in the world of adoption. The legislators did not consider it to be one of their highest priorities. In the past, and in the present, there has been and continues to be no legislation that specifically addresses the rules governing international adoption. However, in the year 1984, the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India, in the landmark decision of Laxmikant Pandey Vs. Union of India, put out a few principles defining the procedures for inter-country adoption, which are still in effect today. Initially, the case was brought on the basis of a letter written to the court by a lawyer named Laxmikant Pandey, who claimed that social organisations and volunteer agencies engaged in the job of placing Indian children with foreign parents were committing fraud and indulging in malpractices. They were accused of not only being subjected to a torturous journey to faraway

   The Preamble of the Indian constitution  By swatee  shukla  Almost every constitution has a preamble that states the objectives or purpose of the document. The preamble of the Indian constitution is part of the constitution. The importance of the preamble is that it helps in interpreting provisions of the constitution.  The purpose of the preamble is to clarify who has made the constitution, what is its source, what is ultimate sanction behind it; what is the nature of the polity is sought to be established by the constitution, and what are its goals and objective? The preamble does not grant any power but it gives a direction and purpose to the constitution.it outlines the objectives of the whole constitution. The preamble contains the fundamentals of the constitution. It serves several important purposes as it contains a clause that brings the constitution into force and it declares the great rights and freedoms which the people of India intended to secure for all its citizens. It

 CASE SUMMARY: I.C. GOLAKHNATH v. STATE OF PUNJAB BY SWATEE SHUKLA In this case, the seventeenth amendment of the constitution of India was challenged on the ground that it limited or restricted certain fundamental rights. The question before the apex court was thus whether parliament had the power to amend any part of the constitution, and in particular, part III thereof, dealing with fundamental rights. This point had already been decided in two earlier cases. In S.P. Singh, the supreme court had unanimously held that parliament had the power to amend any part of the constitution including part III dealing with fundamental rights In the second case, Sajjan Singh v. the state of Rajasthan, the same view was taken, but this time by a majority of 3:2. Since the court was not unanimous in the second case, the present case was referred to a specially constituted bench of 11 judges of the supreme court. Overruling the earlier decisions, 6 out of 11 judges held in this case that parliament

 CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS WITH THE HELP OF ILLUSTRATION S KARTHICK PRAKASH 20BLB1033 A group of public-spirited individuals also filed a Public Interest Litigation before the Supreme Court of India, Delhi. While the ban on diesel buses and trucks older than five years did not directly affect private individuals, the Odd-Even formula did, especially those who have to commute to work and also persons with disabilities and other vulnerable groups who rely on their personal means of transport to get by. The writ petition was based on allegations of the violation of the fundamental rights of the citizens – including Articles 14, 19, and 21 of the Constitution of India. FACTS: The present environmental problems in Delhi, India, are a trouble to the well-being of the megacity's and area's occupants as well as the foliage and fauna. Delhi, the sixth-most populated megalopolis in the world, is one of the most heavily defiled metropolises in India, having for the c

  CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE POWER OF COGNIZANCE HAS BEEN MOSTLY USED IN POLICE COMPLAINTS S KARTHICK PRAKASH C.NO:6374938343 E MAIL: prksh1704@gmail.com INTRODUCTION The structure of the case set up by the pleaders rests on the following four pillars The first pillar on which the pleaders have grounded their case is that the plaintiff had filed her complaint under Section 156 (3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (After now called'CrPC'). In discrepancy, Ld. Chief Judicial Magistrate has progressed in the matter as if it was a complaint filed under Section 190 CrPC. The alternate pillar is that while acting under Section 156 (3) of CrPC, there was no power with the Chief Judicial Magistrate to record substantiation of the plaintiff and her substantiations, as similar, the substantiation so recorded, is without governance. The third pillar, which bears the maximum cargo of the case of the pleaders, is that without indeed taking cognizance of the offence, Ld. Chief Judicial