Skip to main content

Order 16A CPC - Code of Civil Procedure - [APPEALS BY INDIGENT PERSONS]

 Order 16A CPC Description

1[Order XVIA. ATTENDANCE OF WITNESSES CONFINED OR DETAINED IN PRISONS


1. Ins. by Act No. 104 of 1976 (w.e.f. 1-2-1977).


1. Definitions-


In this Order,-


(a) "detained" includes detained under any law providing for preventive detention;


(b) "prison" includes-


(i) any place which has been declared by the State Government, by general or special Order, to be a subsidiary jail; and


(ii) any reformatory, borstal institution or other institution of a like nature.


2. Power to require attendance of prisoners to give evidence


Where it appears to a Court that the evidence of a person confined or detained in a prison within the State is material in a suit, the Court may make an Order requiring the officer in charge of the prison to produce that person before the Court to give evidence :


Provided that, if the distance from the prison to the Court-house is more than twenty-five kilometres, no such Order shall be made unless the Court is satisfied that the examination of such person on commission will not be adequate.


3. Expenses to be paid into Court


(1) Before making any Order under rule 2, the Court shall require the party at whose instance or for whose benefit the Order is to be issued, to pay into Court such sum of money as appears to the Court to be sufficient to defray the expenses of the execution of the Order, including the travelling and other expenses of the escort provided for the witness.


(2) Where the Court is subordinate to a High Court, regard shall be had, in fixing the scale of such expenses, to any rule made by the High Court in that behalf.


4. Power of State Government to exclude certain persons from the operation of rule 2


(1) The State Government may, at any time, having regard to the matters specified in sub-rule (2) by general or special Order, direct that any person or class of persons shall not be removed from the prison in which he or they may be confined or detained, and thereupon, so long as the Order remains in force, no Order made under rule 2, whether before or after the date of the Order made by the State Government, shall have effect in respect of such person or class of persons.


(2) Before making an Order under sub-rule (1), the State Government shall have regard to the following matters, namely :-


(a) the nature of the offence for which, or the grounds on which, the person or class of persons have been Ordered to be confined or detained in prison;


(b) the likelihood of the disturbance of public Order if the person or class of persons is allowed to be removed from the prison; and


(c) the public interest, generally.


5. Officer in charge of prison to abstain from carrying out Order in certain cases


Where the person in respect of whom an Order is made under rule 2-


(a) is certified by the medical officer attached to the prison as unfit to be removed from the prison by reason of sickness or infirmity; or


(b) is under committal for trial or under remand pending trial or pending a preliminary investigation; or


(c) is in custody for a period which would expire before the expiration of the time required for complying with the Order and for taking him back to the prison in which he is confined or detained; or


(d) is a person to whom an Order made by the State Government under rule 4 applies,


the officer in charge of the prison shall abstain from carrying out the Court's Order and shall send to the Court a statement of reason for so abstaining.


6. Prisoner to be brought to Court in custody


In any other case, the officer in charge of the prison shall, upon delivery of the Court's Order, cause the person named therein to be taken to the Court so as to be present at the time mentioned in such Order, and shall cause him to be kept in custody in or near the Court until he has been examined or until the Court authorises him to be taken back to the prison in which he is confined or detained.


7. Power to issue commission for examination of witness in prison


(1) Where it appears to the Court that the evidence of a person confined or detained in a prison, whether within the State or elsewhere in India, is material in a suit but the attendance of such person cannot be secured under the preceding provisions of this Order, the Court may issue a commission for the examination of that person in the prison in which he is confined or detained.


(2) The provisions of Order XXVI shall, so far may be, apply in relation to the examination on commission of such person in prison as they apply in relation to the examination on commission of any other person]

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

LAW INTERNSHIP AND TRAINEE OPPORTUNITY

  LAW INTERNSHIP AND TRAINEE OPPORTUNITY: LEXIS AND COMPANY, renowned for its excellence in the legal field, is thrilled to announce an exceptional internship and trainee opportunity for aspiring final year law students and newly enrolled Advocates. This highly coveted internship  and trainee opportunity  is a paid position, providing a remarkable platform for career growth and experiential learning in a corporate environment. Eligibility: Only for final year Students and Newly Enrolled Advocates. We are offering a limited number of vacancies, designed for law students and newly enrolled advocates in the dynamic world of the legal profession. This is an immediate joining opportunity, available to candidates who are interested to work in the area of commercial and civil litigation and have interest towards drafting, and legal research. As a team member at  LEXIS AND COMPANY,  you will refine your research and drafting skills while witnessing the meticulous professional conduct expected
Post a Comment
Read more

Physical Internship & Training Program - Legal (LEVEL - 1)

   Physical Internship & Training Program - Legal (LEVEL - 1) --- PLEASE READ THE COMPLETE JOB DESCRIPTION BEFORE APPLYING ---   Urgent Hiring for: LAW STUDENTS/CS STUDENTS/ FRESHER LAW GRADUATES/ FRESHER CS. Position: Physical Internship & Training Program - Legal (LEVEL - 1) Department: Legal. Firm Name: LEXIS AND COMPANY – LAW FIRM. Location: Janakpuri, New Delhi. CTC: RS 5000/- Per Month. Additional Allowance: All official expenses including travelling allowance for official purposes will be paid from the day 1 of the service with the firm.   We are urgently looking for LAW STUDENTS / CS STUDENTS / FRESHER LAW GRADUATES / FRESHER CS for the position of Physical Internship & Training Program - Legal (LEVEL - 1) for our Law Firm in Janakpuri, New Delhi.   Eligibility: Mandatory Qualification: Any LAW STUDENTS / CS STUDENTS / FRESHER LAW GRADUATES / FRESHER CS who wants to learn as a beginner. Desired Qualification: Any additional qualification  will be pre
Post a Comment
Read more

The Doctrine of Alternative Danger

  THE DOCTRINE OF ALTERNATIVE DANGER Although the plaintiff is supposed to be cautious in spite of the defendant’s Negligence, there can also be certain situations when the plaintiff is justified in taking some threat where some unsafe state of affairs has been created by way of the defendant. The plaintiff may appear as puzzled or worried through a hazardous state of affairs created via the defendant and to store his man or woman or property, or now and again to store a third party from such danger, he may take a choice risk. The law, therefore, lets in the plaintiff to come across a choice danger to shop by himself from the chance created via the defendant. If the path adopted by him results in some harm to himself, his motion in opposition to the defendant will now not fail. The judgment of the plaintiff, however, is not rash. The position can be defined by means of the case of Jones v . Boyce . In that case, the plaintiff used to be a passenger in the defendant’s train and instruct
Post a Comment
Read more