Skip to main content

Online Internship Opportunity at CIPRA [NLSIU IP Center]: Apply Now!

 

NLSIU IP Center (CIPRA):

The IP Center of NLSIU, Bangalore – CIPRA (Center for Intellectual Property Research and Advocacy), has introduced an Online Internship policy in light of COVID-19.

About the internship:

Role of interns:

  • Interns have to attend a mandatory 30-minute lecture given by the Research Associate on any topic every day.
  • Interns will be provided with zoom links by the Research Associate. Interns are to co-ordinate with Ms. Sadhana for the links to such meetings and to contact any research associate if they wish.
  • The intern will have to write an original 1000-1200 word small article Each week to be vetted by any research associate for publication on the website (either of the two). The formatting of such articles will follow standard formatting rules and bluebook 20th edition footnoting format.
  • Interns have to make one presentation at the end of the month on any topic that they have worked on during the month.
  • completion of the internship would be only on the submission of four original pieces on any area of IPR.

How to apply:

Interns are required to send their CV and cover letter to cipra@nls.ac.in at least two weeks in advance for the Internship.

Duration of internship:

The internship will be of minimum 30 days.

Visit:

Visit us for more opportunities: https://lexpeeps.in/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Understanding Counterclaims: A Comprehensive Guide

  Understanding Counterclaims: A Comprehensive Guide In legal proceedings, a counterclaim is a vital tool that allows defendants to assert their own claims against the plaintiff. This strategic maneuver not only defends against the plaintiff's allegations but also enables defendants to seek their own relief. In this comprehensive guide, we delve into the intricacies of counterclaims, exploring their purpose, procedures, and implications in various legal contexts. Introduction to Counterclaims Definition A counterclaim is a legal claim brought by a defendant against the plaintiff in response to the plaintiff's initial complaint. It serves as a means for defendants to assert their own rights, defenses, or causes of action arising from the same transaction or occurrence as the plaintiff's claim. Purpose The primary purpose of a counterclaim is to allow defendants to present their side of the story and seek appropriate remedies or relief. By filing a counterclaim, defendants ca...

Title: Understanding "Your Complaint has been Disposed under a Closed Complaint"

  Title: Understanding "Your Complaint has been Disposed under a Closed Complaint" When you receive a notification stating "Your complaint has been disposed under a closed complaint," it signifies the closure of the complaint you filed with the respective entity or organization. This phrase is commonly used by customer service departments, grievance redressal cells, regulatory bodies, or complaint management systems to inform complainants about the resolution status of their complaint. Here's a detailed explanation of what it means and its implications: Disposition of Complaint (0-7 days) : "Disposed" indicates that the complaint has been addressed, reviewed, and resolved by the concerned authority or entity. The closure of the complaint signifies that the responsible party has taken appropriate action to address the issues raised in the complaint. Closure Status (0-7 days) : "Closed complaint" indicates that the complaint resolution process ...

The Doctrine of Alternative Danger

  THE DOCTRINE OF ALTERNATIVE DANGER Although the plaintiff is supposed to be cautious in spite of the defendant’s Negligence, there can also be certain situations when the plaintiff is justified in taking some threat where some unsafe state of affairs has been created by way of the defendant. The plaintiff may appear as puzzled or worried through a hazardous state of affairs created via the defendant and to store his man or woman or property, or now and again to store a third party from such danger, he may take a choice risk. The law, therefore, lets in the plaintiff to come across a choice danger to shop by himself from the chance created via the defendant. If the path adopted by him results in some harm to himself, his motion in opposition to the defendant will now not fail. The judgment of the plaintiff, however, is not rash. The position can be defined by means of the case of Jones v . Boyce . In that case, the plaintiff used to be a passenger in the defendant’s train and inst...