Skip to main content




In the commercial world, unlimited agreements and contracts are made and the parties are expected to perform their part. On non- performance, they can be sued by another party for breach of contract. But what if it becomes impossible for a party or for both the parties, to perform their part? Can the parties be sued, having done no fault? This is where the “doctrine of frustration” comes into play.

Meaning of the Doctrine

The concept of the doctrine of frustration comes under S.56 of Indian Contract Act, 1852. This section mentions that an agreement to do an impossible act is in itself void. This doctrine refers to the point that a promisor won’t be held liable under contract if there’s impossibility, for that promisor to perform his or her obligations under that contract. As per this doctrine, the relevant contract will also be held to be void. The basis of this doctrine is that the relevant contract becomes impossible to be performed due to an event which is not under the control of the parties i.e., the contract becomes frustrated.

Application of the Doctrine

The Doctrine of Frustration is applicable under two situations i.e.,

  1. If the object of the contract has become impossible to be performed, or

  2. If any event has occurred, which has made the performance of the contract impossible and is beyond the promisor’s control

So here, we have two circumstances under which this doctrine is applied. The first one is if the object of the contract has become impossible to be performed. Let’s take the help of an illustration here. Suppose A and B are the parties to a contract, in which A has to supply 100 cartons of a special kind of sweet to B and for the same, B will pay rupees y. That sweet is one which is famous to be made by A and B wants it to made by A only. Before performing her obligation i.e., making and delivering sweets to B, A died. Now, it has become impossible to fulfill the contract’s object here. B can’t do anything in this, as it was beyond her control. So, the doctrine of frustration will apply and B won’t be able to get the desired sweets. Also, she can’t sue A’s legal heirs or anyone for the performance of contract’s obligations.

Further, we have another situation under which this doctrine is applicable i.e., when any event has occurred, which has made the performance of the contract impossible and is beyond the promisor’s control. Taking another illustration for this: Suppose A and B have contracted, in which A has to supply 100kg mangoes to B, from India to Australia. Two weeks before the delivery, a new law was passed in India declaring export and import of edible items to be illegal in India. Now., the parties have no control over this situation and can do nothing but frustrate. The performance of the contract has become impossible.

In both the cases, the agreement would have been completely valid and turned into contract subsequently. But, due to unwanted and unavoidable circumstances, they became void or illegal to be performed.

Generally, this occurs in the following cases:

  1. Death of a party or Incapacity of party

  2. By virtue of legislation

  3. Due to change of circumstances

Mentioning two cases in which this particular doctrine was applied:

  1. Robinson v. Davison

  2. Rozan Mian v. Tahera Begum

In the case Robinson v. Davison, as per the contract, a piano player had to perform at a concert but on the day of performance, he fell ill. It was held by the court that falling ill wasn’t the piano player’s fault and to be unable to perform at the concert was not under his control. The contract was frustrated.

In the case Rozan Mian v. Tahera Begum, the specific performance of the agreement for sale became impossible to be performed, by reason of promulgation of the West Bengal Thika Tenancy, during the pendency of the suit. Due to operation of law, the contract became void and was frustrated.


It can be concluded that no matter how many years pass by but this doctrine will always have its effect and will come into play. This is so because be it any time, unforeseeable events will always occur, making the performance of contract impossible. The doctrine has got importance because it exempts the parties from their liabilities, as they had no control over the performance of relevant contract.



  1. Hi there to everybody, it’s my first go to see of this web site; this weblog consists of awesome and in fact good stuff for visitors. Hurrah, that’s what I was exploring for, what stuff! Existing here at this blog, thanks admin of this web site. You can also visit Receipt Builder Tool for more Receipt Builder related information and knowledge.


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog


  LAW INTERNSHIP AND TRAINEE OPPORTUNITY: LEXIS AND COMPANY, renowned for its excellence in the legal field, is thrilled to announce an exceptional internship and trainee opportunity for aspiring final year law students and newly enrolled Advocates. This highly coveted internship  and trainee opportunity  is a paid position, providing a remarkable platform for career growth and experiential learning in a corporate environment. Eligibility: Only for final year Students and Newly Enrolled Advocates. We are offering a limited number of vacancies, designed for law students and newly enrolled advocates in the dynamic world of the legal profession. This is an immediate joining opportunity, available to candidates who are interested to work in the area of commercial and civil litigation and have interest towards drafting, and legal research. As a team member at  LEXIS AND COMPANY,  you will refine your research and drafting skills while witnessing the meticulous professional conduct expected

Physical Internship & Training Program - Legal (LEVEL - 1)

   Physical Internship & Training Program - Legal (LEVEL - 1) --- PLEASE READ THE COMPLETE JOB DESCRIPTION BEFORE APPLYING ---   Urgent Hiring for: LAW STUDENTS/CS STUDENTS/ FRESHER LAW GRADUATES/ FRESHER CS. Position: Physical Internship & Training Program - Legal (LEVEL - 1) Department: Legal. Firm Name: LEXIS AND COMPANY – LAW FIRM. Location: Janakpuri, New Delhi. CTC: RS 5000/- Per Month. Additional Allowance: All official expenses including travelling allowance for official purposes will be paid from the day 1 of the service with the firm.   We are urgently looking for LAW STUDENTS / CS STUDENTS / FRESHER LAW GRADUATES / FRESHER CS for the position of Physical Internship & Training Program - Legal (LEVEL - 1) for our Law Firm in Janakpuri, New Delhi.   Eligibility: Mandatory Qualification: Any LAW STUDENTS / CS STUDENTS / FRESHER LAW GRADUATES / FRESHER CS who wants to learn as a beginner. Desired Qualification: Any additional qualification  will be pre

The Doctrine of Alternative Danger

  THE DOCTRINE OF ALTERNATIVE DANGER Although the plaintiff is supposed to be cautious in spite of the defendant’s Negligence, there can also be certain situations when the plaintiff is justified in taking some threat where some unsafe state of affairs has been created by way of the defendant. The plaintiff may appear as puzzled or worried through a hazardous state of affairs created via the defendant and to store his man or woman or property, or now and again to store a third party from such danger, he may take a choice risk. The law, therefore, lets in the plaintiff to come across a choice danger to shop by himself from the chance created via the defendant. If the path adopted by him results in some harm to himself, his motion in opposition to the defendant will now not fail. The judgment of the plaintiff, however, is not rash. The position can be defined by means of the case of Jones v . Boyce . In that case, the plaintiff used to be a passenger in the defendant’s train and instruct