Skip to main content

3 Farm Laws


A huge protest was started especially in the states of Punjab & Haryana against the Farm Laws. The government stated that, these laws will provide more opportunities for the farmers to sell their product anywhere in the country (even outside Agricultural Produce Market Committee) and to anyone they want (even with MNCs). There is no need for any payment of any tax outside the APMCs. These laws were enacted after 2 decades of consultation and research on the farm laws. But the arguments of the farmers are that, no consultation was made by the government regarding the farm laws; these farm laws will not be beneficial to the farmers in anyway, as they can lead to the end of APMCs, farmers’ subsidies and the concept of Minimum Support Price. This will lead to the exploitation of the farmers in long run.

Though there are problems in APMCs such as, the place at which they are established, there may be 1 APM for 5 to 10 districts. In such situation, small farmers, sell their crops to the nearest traders. When we see the statistics, only 6% of the farmers are availing the benefit of MSPs.

  • Promotion & Facilitation Act, 2020: Farmers can sell their products outside the APMCs to whomever they want and at whatever the price they want and no tax will be levied on that.

  • Contract Farming Act, 2020: The risks in selling the products to the Private Companies will be borne by the Private Companies and the farmers will not be burdened with any risk.

  • Essential Commodities Act, 2020: Incentives for cold storage was provided.

The farmers argue that, they may seem beneficial prima facie, but in the long run, it will not be practical. If farmers are unable to sell their products in the other district, then it is not reasonable to assume that, they will sell their produce in the other states or to the private companies. Even if they sell their produce to the private companies, if there is no produce due to any unforeseen circumstances, then there is a possibility of losing their land to the private companies. Even if they don’t lose the land, the farmers don’t have enough power to do a legal battle with a huge company. Even, the farmers cannot approach the civil courts if they have any issue with the contract. So, the farmers are agitating against the farm laws and they have been repealed and were in force less than a year.

The protest against this farm laws started in Punjab & Haryana and later spread throughout the North India. Roads and many public places were occupied by the protesters. All the protesters went to Delhi shouting the slogan “Chalo Dilli”. Many attempts were made on social media to declare the protesting farmers as anti-nationalists. Though, both Hindus and Muslims together joined the protest peacefully, for protecting their rights, some of the politicians tried to raise the communal disputes, send the hooligans to make the protest violent and many attempts were made to stop them. Though they have started their protest after taking permission from the government in their states, later, the Delhi Government rejected the permission, stating that no protest can be done during Covid situation. But, the farmers didn’t stop and continued to protest. Though there is a right to protest guaranteed under Article 19 1(a) & (b) of the Constitution of India, that right has reasonable restrictions as stated in the Article 19 (2) & (3). Though, the protest is for a valid reason, you cannot protest wherever you want and whenever you want. Dissent and Democracy go hand in hand. So, farmers have the right to protest, but they should have done it at the right place as stated in the Shaheen Bagh Judgment.

3 Farm Laws by Velanati Jyothirmai @ Lex Cliq


Popular posts from this blog


  LAW INTERNSHIP AND TRAINEE OPPORTUNITY: LEXIS AND COMPANY, renowned for its excellence in the legal field, is thrilled to announce an exceptional internship and trainee opportunity for aspiring final year law students and newly enrolled Advocates. This highly coveted internship  and trainee opportunity  is a paid position, providing a remarkable platform for career growth and experiential learning in a corporate environment. Eligibility: Only for final year Students and Newly Enrolled Advocates. We are offering a limited number of vacancies, designed for law students and newly enrolled advocates in the dynamic world of the legal profession. This is an immediate joining opportunity, available to candidates who are interested to work in the area of commercial and civil litigation and have interest towards drafting, and legal research. As a team member at  LEXIS AND COMPANY,  you will refine your research and drafting skills while witnessing the meticulous professional conduct expected

Physical Internship & Training Program - Legal (LEVEL - 1)

   Physical Internship & Training Program - Legal (LEVEL - 1) --- PLEASE READ THE COMPLETE JOB DESCRIPTION BEFORE APPLYING ---   Urgent Hiring for: LAW STUDENTS/CS STUDENTS/ FRESHER LAW GRADUATES/ FRESHER CS. Position: Physical Internship & Training Program - Legal (LEVEL - 1) Department: Legal. Firm Name: LEXIS AND COMPANY – LAW FIRM. Location: Janakpuri, New Delhi. CTC: RS 5000/- Per Month. Additional Allowance: All official expenses including travelling allowance for official purposes will be paid from the day 1 of the service with the firm.   We are urgently looking for LAW STUDENTS / CS STUDENTS / FRESHER LAW GRADUATES / FRESHER CS for the position of Physical Internship & Training Program - Legal (LEVEL - 1) for our Law Firm in Janakpuri, New Delhi.   Eligibility: Mandatory Qualification: Any LAW STUDENTS / CS STUDENTS / FRESHER LAW GRADUATES / FRESHER CS who wants to learn as a beginner. Desired Qualification: Any additional qualification  will be pre

The Doctrine of Alternative Danger

  THE DOCTRINE OF ALTERNATIVE DANGER Although the plaintiff is supposed to be cautious in spite of the defendant’s Negligence, there can also be certain situations when the plaintiff is justified in taking some threat where some unsafe state of affairs has been created by way of the defendant. The plaintiff may appear as puzzled or worried through a hazardous state of affairs created via the defendant and to store his man or woman or property, or now and again to store a third party from such danger, he may take a choice risk. The law, therefore, lets in the plaintiff to come across a choice danger to shop by himself from the chance created via the defendant. If the path adopted by him results in some harm to himself, his motion in opposition to the defendant will now not fail. The judgment of the plaintiff, however, is not rash. The position can be defined by means of the case of Jones v . Boyce . In that case, the plaintiff used to be a passenger in the defendant’s train and instruct