Skip to main content

Article 368 and some important amendments to the constitution of India.

 Article 368 and some important amendments to the constitution of India.

By swatee Shukla

Article 368-Under Article 368 of the Indian Constitution, the Parliament is empowered to amend it

and its procedures. Amendments to the Indian Constitution are not easy to produce and require

compliance with other provisions. Article 368 grants Parliament some powers allowing it to amend it

while keeping its fundamental form just the same. Article 368 of the Constitution of India cites two

types of amendments to the Constitution of India. The form of amendment is by a simple legislative

majority (Lok Sabha & Rajya Sabha), the second type of amendment is by a special parliamentary

majority, and the third type is with the approval of a special majority and by half the total state.

The constitution of India, having been adopted on 26 th November 1949, has undergone numerous

changes since the nearly 7 decades it was enforced. While none of the amendments are

insignificant, many have assumed a grant amount of significance over the years due to the manner

of its passing, the subject matter, or the judiciary's reaction to the same.

The first amendment to the constitution took place just after a year of enactment, i.e. in 1951 –

amended articles 15 &19 and inserted articles 31A, 32B, and schedule 9. This amendment added a

special provision for the advancement of any socially and educationally backward classes or the

scheduled castes and scheduled tribes and to fully secure the constitutional validity of zamindari

abolition laws and to place a reasonable restriction on freedom of speech. A new constitutional

device called scheduled 9 was introduced to protect laws that are contrary to the constitutionally

guaranteed fundamental rights. These laws encroach upon property rights, freedom of speech, and

equality before the law.

Another such important amendment was 24 th amendment in the year 1971 which amended articles

13 and 368 and enabled parliament to dilute fundamental rights through amendments to the

constitution. Further, in the year 1972, the 25 th amendment took place which amended article 31

and inserted article 31C resulting in restricting property rights and compensation in case the state

takes over private property. However, the supreme court quashed a part in article 31C, to the extent

it took away the power of judicial review. This was done in the landmark case of Kesavananda Bharti

v. State of Kerala which for the first time enunciated the basic structure doctrine.

The next amendment was 39 th amendment which took place in 1975 and amended articles 71 and

329 and schedule 9 and inserted article 329A. This amendment was made to nullify the judgment of

Allahabad High Court invalidating prime minister Indira Gandhi’s election to parliament. Amendment

restricted judicial scrutiny of the post of prime minister. The amendment was introduced and passed

very quickly. As a consequence of this amendment to the constitution of India, the supreme court of

India scheduled a hearing of a petition challenging prime minister election infructuous. Later,

however, Article 329A was struck down by the supreme court in the case of Indira Nehru Gandhi vs

Shri ram Narain, for violating basic structure.

Next comes the 42 nd amendment, also well known as mini-constitution. 42 nd amendment took place

in the year 1976 which amended over 45 articles, and schedule 7. It also inserted over 10 articles.

The said amendment was passed during an internal emergency by Indira Gandhi. It provides for

curtailment of fundamental rights, imposes fundamental duties, and changes to the basic structure

of the constitution by making India a “socialist, secular” republic. However, the supreme court, in


Minerva mills v. union of India, quashed the amendments to articles 32C and 368 as it was in

contravention with the basic structure of the constitution.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Understanding Counterclaims: A Comprehensive Guide

  Understanding Counterclaims: A Comprehensive Guide In legal proceedings, a counterclaim is a vital tool that allows defendants to assert their own claims against the plaintiff. This strategic maneuver not only defends against the plaintiff's allegations but also enables defendants to seek their own relief. In this comprehensive guide, we delve into the intricacies of counterclaims, exploring their purpose, procedures, and implications in various legal contexts. Introduction to Counterclaims Definition A counterclaim is a legal claim brought by a defendant against the plaintiff in response to the plaintiff's initial complaint. It serves as a means for defendants to assert their own rights, defenses, or causes of action arising from the same transaction or occurrence as the plaintiff's claim. Purpose The primary purpose of a counterclaim is to allow defendants to present their side of the story and seek appropriate remedies or relief. By filing a counterclaim, defendants ca...

Title: Legal Recourse Against Electronic Harassment, Including V2K: Understanding Options and Rights

  Title: Legal Recourse Against Electronic Harassment, Including V2K: Understanding Options and Rights Electronic harassment, including technologies like Voice-to-Skull (V2K) and other forms of electronic harassment, can inflict significant psychological and emotional harm on individuals. Victims of such harassment often wonder if there are legal avenues available to seek redress and hold perpetrators accountable for their actions. While navigating legal action in cases of electronic harassment can be complex, understanding available options and rights is crucial. Here's a detailed exploration of the possibility of taking legal action against individuals engaged in electronic harassment: Understanding Electronic Harassment (0-7 days) : Electronic harassment encompasses a range of behaviors involving the use of electronic devices or technologies to inflict harm, including V2K, electronic surveillance, cyberstalking, and cyberbullying. V2K, in particular, refers to the transmission o...

Title: Understanding "Your Complaint has been Disposed under a Closed Complaint"

  Title: Understanding "Your Complaint has been Disposed under a Closed Complaint" When you receive a notification stating "Your complaint has been disposed under a closed complaint," it signifies the closure of the complaint you filed with the respective entity or organization. This phrase is commonly used by customer service departments, grievance redressal cells, regulatory bodies, or complaint management systems to inform complainants about the resolution status of their complaint. Here's a detailed explanation of what it means and its implications: Disposition of Complaint (0-7 days) : "Disposed" indicates that the complaint has been addressed, reviewed, and resolved by the concerned authority or entity. The closure of the complaint signifies that the responsible party has taken appropriate action to address the issues raised in the complaint. Closure Status (0-7 days) : "Closed complaint" indicates that the complaint resolution process ...