Skip to main content

Delhi Riots

 DELHI RIOTS

After the Citizenship Amendment was passed in the Parliament, a widespread criticism was faced all over the country. Some of the politicians arranged made speeches at the gathering against Anti-CAA protestors, instigating them to the attacks against them. This led to the attacks and riots against many Muslims in the Delhi. The Pro-CAA protesters led attacks against Anti-CAA protestors after inspiring from the speeches of the politicians. No politician came to stop the riots. Many mosques, madrasahs, houses, and shops belonging to Muslims were burnt, destroyed and robbed. Many Muslims were killed and some went missing. Many of the Muslims in the riot hit area were terrified and some of them, even evacuated their residences and settled at different places. There was no immediate police action, which resulted in this severe loss. Even after the CM of Delhi, Arvind Kejriwal, ordered Police to take action, they failed to do so. Thus, Army had to intervene to resolve the issue. There were some reports stating that Police were also involved in the riots and even committed sexual assault against Muslim women. Even after a lot of allegations against the Politicians and Police, the Police have given a clean chit for politicians and for themselves.

Many FIRs were registered against both Hindus and Muslims, who have attacked and injured the people. The huge human loss can be stated was caused due to the inaction of the police immediately. Most of the Muslims against whom the suits had been filed, were released on bail by the Delhi High Court, as the evidence provided has not met the requirements of the allegations made against them. Even, the FIR registered was late and some of the petitioners have not even identified the accused. So, those who were in the jail, who innocence was not proved and were not granted bail, don’t mean they have committed the crime. The faulty investigation, inadequate evidence led to the prolonged court procedure and thus, injustice was caused to the accused.

The judge, who condemned the inaction of the police, has been transferred to Punjab & Haryana High Court overnight, stating that the decision was made based in the recommendation of Supreme Court Collegium.

A new bench was formed to continue the hearing and ordered the police to file FIRs against the politicians, who made hate speeches. But the government advocate requested for more time, and has been accepted by the new bench, which was rejected by the earlier bench.

The Court has charged three men Deepak, Prince, Shiv for allegedly vandalizing a mosque and setting it on fire on February 24, 2020.

The Delhi High Court had sentenced and convicted the first man, Dinesh Yadav connected to Delhi Riots for setting a house on fire and robbing it, to a period of five years in jail. Dinesh Yadav was convicted under the Sections 143, 147, 148, 457, 392, 436 read with 149 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

Since, there was only adequate evidence to convict Dinesh Yadav only under the Section 149 and considering the age of him, and the fact that he is the first time offender, the Court had awarded the sentence.

Even now, many FIRs are yet to be filed and court proceedings will have to be taken place. In this case, the court procedure has been delayed and as, the Justice delayed is Justice denied, in the opinion of the author, injustice has occurred to the victims of the Delhi Riots.


Delhi Riots by Velanati Jyothirmai @ Lex Cliq


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

LAW INTERNSHIP AND TRAINEE OPPORTUNITY

  LAW INTERNSHIP AND TRAINEE OPPORTUNITY: LEXIS AND COMPANY, renowned for its excellence in the legal field, is thrilled to announce an exceptional internship and trainee opportunity for aspiring final year law students and newly enrolled Advocates. This highly coveted internship  and trainee opportunity  is a paid position, providing a remarkable platform for career growth and experiential learning in a corporate environment. Eligibility: Only for final year Students and Newly Enrolled Advocates. We are offering a limited number of vacancies, designed for law students and newly enrolled advocates in the dynamic world of the legal profession. This is an immediate joining opportunity, available to candidates who are interested to work in the area of commercial and civil litigation and have interest towards drafting, and legal research. As a team member at  LEXIS AND COMPANY,  you will refine your research and drafting skills while witnessing the meticulous professional conduct expected

Physical Internship & Training Program - Legal (LEVEL - 1)

   Physical Internship & Training Program - Legal (LEVEL - 1) --- PLEASE READ THE COMPLETE JOB DESCRIPTION BEFORE APPLYING ---   Urgent Hiring for: LAW STUDENTS/CS STUDENTS/ FRESHER LAW GRADUATES/ FRESHER CS. Position: Physical Internship & Training Program - Legal (LEVEL - 1) Department: Legal. Firm Name: LEXIS AND COMPANY – LAW FIRM. Location: Janakpuri, New Delhi. CTC: RS 5000/- Per Month. Additional Allowance: All official expenses including travelling allowance for official purposes will be paid from the day 1 of the service with the firm.   We are urgently looking for LAW STUDENTS / CS STUDENTS / FRESHER LAW GRADUATES / FRESHER CS for the position of Physical Internship & Training Program - Legal (LEVEL - 1) for our Law Firm in Janakpuri, New Delhi.   Eligibility: Mandatory Qualification: Any LAW STUDENTS / CS STUDENTS / FRESHER LAW GRADUATES / FRESHER CS who wants to learn as a beginner. Desired Qualification: Any additional qualification  will be pre

The Doctrine of Alternative Danger

  THE DOCTRINE OF ALTERNATIVE DANGER Although the plaintiff is supposed to be cautious in spite of the defendant’s Negligence, there can also be certain situations when the plaintiff is justified in taking some threat where some unsafe state of affairs has been created by way of the defendant. The plaintiff may appear as puzzled or worried through a hazardous state of affairs created via the defendant and to store his man or woman or property, or now and again to store a third party from such danger, he may take a choice risk. The law, therefore, lets in the plaintiff to come across a choice danger to shop by himself from the chance created via the defendant. If the path adopted by him results in some harm to himself, his motion in opposition to the defendant will now not fail. The judgment of the plaintiff, however, is not rash. The position can be defined by means of the case of Jones v . Boyce . In that case, the plaintiff used to be a passenger in the defendant’s train and instruct