law and morality
Introduction
The world around us is a mix of various views, values, laws, and standards, all of which
dictate how one should act in society. To avoid ambiguity and confusion, it is critical to make
distinctions between all of these. Law and morality are two such problems that are frequently
discussed together. Laws are formal laws that outline what we must and must not do as
members of a society. These are put in place by the state and the judiciary in order to
establish a basic and enforceable code of conduct for the good of society. Morality on the
other hand refers to an informal framework of values, principles, beliefs, customs, and ways
of living. Morals are not legally enforceable but there is societal pressure to abide by the
same.
Relationship between law and morality
Law and Morality are two systems that govern the way humans behave. Law is a body of
rules and regulations that all people are mandatorily obligated to adhere to. Morals, on the
other hand, refer to general principles or standards of behavior that define human conduct
within society but are not compulsory to be followed. The relationship between law and
morality is a complicated one and has evolved over the years. Initially, the two were
considered equivalent but with time and progressiveness, it is highlighted that the two are
different concepts, but with certain inter-dependency between them.
History
There was no separation between law and morals in ancient times, when legal restrictions
were yet in their infancy. Dharma was regarded as law and morality in India. For example,
Hindu law was primarily formed on the Vedas and Smritis, which were essentially people's
ideals. However, over time, Mimansa developed a set of principles that distinguished
between obligatory rules, which are those that must be obeyed and are regarded law, and
recommendatory rules, which are those that are advised because they are beneficial and
would amount to morality if followed. Even in the middle age period, the Bible was
considered as the major factor which influenced the legal regulations. Eventually, with time
and new philosophies, the idea that there is a difference between these two concepts emerged.
Difference between law and morality
Law and morality may be interdependent to an extent and have certain similarities such as the
same goals, but there are certain factors based on which the two concepts can be
differentiated:
1. Law is derived from an external source which means that it is obtained through
rules and regulations. Morality emerges from internal sources, i.e. it comes from
the individual mind of a person.
2. Law treats all people in the same manner and doesn’t change from person to
person but morality is a subjective concept.
3. Morality has influenced the creation of laws but morality existed in society since
even before legal implications were discussed.
4. Disobedience of the law leads to punishment but there are no repercussions of
doing anything morally wrong.
5. Laws lay down mandatory behaviour that is expected out of the people who are
governed under the said law. However, morality does not lay down strict
guidelines of how one should behave but is a more personal concept.
Conclusion
It is clear that law and morality have a long history and it is believed that law is heavily
influenced by morality. While that is true, it can also be observed that rules and regulations
also have a great impact on the moral standards that exist in society. For example, when
voting rights were not given to women, the majority of people believed that it is morally
incorrect to give women a voice due to multiple reasons. It is only when this voice took the
form of a law that people slowly started accepting the agency of a woman and their moral
ideologies on the issue began to change. Law has a lot of power to change the way people
view things and must be used as a right tool as opposed to morality. It is essential to
understand that there isn’t supposed to be a competition between these two concepts in terms
of analyzing which is more productive for the welfare of the society, but for law and morality
to walk hand in hand for the evolution of the legal world in the most fruitful manner.
Comments
Post a Comment