Skip to main content

Police Reforms – installation of CCTV Cameras

 POLICE REFORMS – CCTV CAMERAS INSTALLATION

There are many instances in the past as well as present, where we can find false imprisonment, planting evidences, fake police report, custodial torture, custodial death, misbehavior, bribing and lobbying, search without warrant and seizure of property, etc. There is a great need to take action against it. In many judgments, the Courts have ordered to establish a controlling authority to look after all these issues and install CCTV Cameras. But, no serious steps were taken. Recently, in the case of Paramvir Singh Saini v. Baljit Singh, the Supreme Court ordered for the installation of CCTV Cameras and recording equipment in police stations and in offices of agencies where such interrogation and holding of accused takes place. This can protect the Fundamental Right i.e., Article 21 of the people either arrested by police or the people who came to complain about something. Right to Life also includes right to live a dignified life and these CCTV Cameras help to ensure, there will be no misbehavior, false cases, etc. from the side of police.

Technology has developed at lot. With the changing time, reform should be taken place in every field to ensure progress. To record the confessions of the accused, testimonies of the witnesses, dying declarations or the statement of victims, etc. video recording was made mandatory, to know the accuracy behind them, by comparing them with the statements made in the courts. Whenever there are any allegations against the police officers, then it can be investigated using the CCTV footage. If any such thing happens, then a complaint can also be made under the Sections 17 and 18 of the Human Right Act, 1993 in the Human Rights Commission. Then the Commission can refer the CCTV footage for investigating the issue. The Court has also referred the case of Shafhi Mohammad v. State of Himachal Pradesh, and directed the government to establish Central, State and District Level Oversight Committees. 

In the case of D.K. Basu v. State of West Bengal, similar orders were given, but there was some ambiguity regarding the positioning and record storing time of the CCTV footage. All the ambiguities are cleared in the case of Paramvir Singh Saini and the Supreme Court stated that, the CCTV cameras must be equipped with night vision and installed in all the premises of the police station or the investigation agencies and the record should be stored for 18 months. The Oversight Committees should check the footages and submit their reports monthly. The constitution of the members of the committees was also stated by the Court. The Court directed the Government and Police to follow the measures as soon as possible. Even though, this step should have been taken by the Executive Body a long time ago, since, it failed to do so, and a suit have been initiated regarding that issue, the Judiciary has to intervene and it took a great step to ensure the fundamental right (Article 21) of the people by the system of checks and balances.


Police Reforms – installation of CCTV Cameras by Velanati Jyothirmai @ Lex Cliq
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Physical Internship & Training Program - Legal (LEVEL - 1)

   Physical Internship & Training Program - Legal (LEVEL - 1) --- PLEASE READ THE COMPLETE JOB DESCRIPTION BEFORE APPLYING ---   Urgent Hiring for: LAW STUDENTS/CS STUDENTS/ FRESHER LAW GRADUATES/ FRESHER CS. Position: Physical Internship & Training Program - Legal (LEVEL - 1) Department: Legal. Firm Name: LEXIS AND COMPANY – LAW FIRM. Location: Janakpuri, New Delhi. CTC: RS 5000/- Per Month. Additional Allowance: All official expenses including travelling allowance for official purposes will be paid from the day 1 of the service with the firm.   We are urgently looking for LAW STUDENTS / CS STUDENTS / FRESHER LAW GRADUATES / FRESHER CS for the position of Physical Internship & Training Program - Legal (LEVEL - 1) for our Law Firm in Janakpuri, New Delhi.   Eligibility: Mandatory Qualification: Any LAW STUDENTS / CS STUDENTS / FRESHER LAW GRADUATES / FRESHER CS who wants to learn as a beginner. Desired Qualification: Any additional qualification  will be pre
Post a Comment
Read more

LAW INTERNSHIP AND TRAINEE OPPORTUNITY

  LAW INTERNSHIP AND TRAINEE OPPORTUNITY: LEXIS AND COMPANY, renowned for its excellence in the legal field, is thrilled to announce an exceptional internship and trainee opportunity for aspiring final year law students and newly enrolled Advocates. This highly coveted internship  and trainee opportunity  is a paid position, providing a remarkable platform for career growth and experiential learning in a corporate environment. Eligibility: Only for final year Students and Newly Enrolled Advocates. We are offering a limited number of vacancies, designed for law students and newly enrolled advocates in the dynamic world of the legal profession. This is an immediate joining opportunity, available to candidates who are interested to work in the area of commercial and civil litigation and have interest towards drafting, and legal research. As a team member at  LEXIS AND COMPANY,  you will refine your research and drafting skills while witnessing the meticulous professional conduct expected
Post a Comment
Read more

The Doctrine of Alternative Danger

  THE DOCTRINE OF ALTERNATIVE DANGER Although the plaintiff is supposed to be cautious in spite of the defendant’s Negligence, there can also be certain situations when the plaintiff is justified in taking some threat where some unsafe state of affairs has been created by way of the defendant. The plaintiff may appear as puzzled or worried through a hazardous state of affairs created via the defendant and to store his man or woman or property, or now and again to store a third party from such danger, he may take a choice risk. The law, therefore, lets in the plaintiff to come across a choice danger to shop by himself from the chance created via the defendant. If the path adopted by him results in some harm to himself, his motion in opposition to the defendant will now not fail. The judgment of the plaintiff, however, is not rash. The position can be defined by means of the case of Jones v . Boyce . In that case, the plaintiff used to be a passenger in the defendant’s train and instruct
Post a Comment
Read more