Skip to main content

Prostitution is legal ?

 Prostitution is Legal?


Prostitution is the practice of engaging in sexual activity for money but not with a spouse or a friend.  Prostitution is illegal in many countries, it is considered against humanity. Such a career is considered vulgar and is shamed upon.  

India from its ancient times is considered to be religious and of a traditional mindset. India respects its morals and values, it is also very strict with it but it is shocking to state that prostitution is considered legal. In 1950, the government of India ratified the International Convention for Suppression of Immoral Traffic in Persons and Exploitation of the Prostitution of others.  After 6 years the country passed the Suppression of Immoral Traffic in Women and Girls act. In 1986, the act was amended which resulted in an Immoral Traffic Prevention act known as PITA.

 Before explaining the sections it is equally important to understand the difference between trafficking and prostitution. Trafficking is considered a process of commercial sexual exploitation. Trafficking is means a process of recruiting, contracting, procuring, or hiring a person for commercial purposes therefore trafficking is different from prostitution. Even though the terms are different but still this act covers prostitution. The act defines, sex workers as prostitutes, and section 7, talks about the prostitution shouldn't be carried on in public places but it doesn't say directly that prostitution is legal. 

Prostitution might be legal but other activities are illegal in Indian law. Under IPC, there are certain provisions such as soliciting services of prostitution at public places, carrying out prostitution activities in hotels, being the owner of a brothel, pimping, indulging in prostitution by arranging a sex worker, and arrangement of a sexual act with a customer.

Prostitution might be legal but these restrictions are somewhere a problem for prostitutes.  PITA's constitution was validity was questioned in the court in the case of the State of Uttar Pradesh v. Kaushalaya, in this case, prostitutes were asked to remove from their place to maintain peace in the city of Kanpur. It was held by the High Court, that pronouncement that section 20 of act abridged the article 14 and sub-clauses d and e of article 19 of the Indian Constitution. The act was held to be constitutionally valid. 

There was one more case, which specified that prostitutes are also human and should be treated with humanity and dignity.No one should assault them this case also discuss problems related to sex workers which they suffer on daily basis.  Budhadev Karmaskar's case further talks about how these women are compelled by the situation and financial problem, they are not doing this work by will instead through force.  The court directed the government to make a few homes where they can be protected and also make provisions for various courses so that they learn new skills and knowledge to get out of this work. The Supreme court further gave power to the government to make ancillary rules for such category people.

 In the end, I would like to sum up by saying that, though India isn’t against prostitution in terms of laws, it still lacks the flexibility to be practiced, I accept that this work might not be praised but one should understand that it is work done women to survive in this brutal world. People should change their mindset and take this as a profession. 



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

LAW INTERNSHIP AND TRAINEE OPPORTUNITY

  LAW INTERNSHIP AND TRAINEE OPPORTUNITY: LEXIS AND COMPANY, renowned for its excellence in the legal field, is thrilled to announce an exceptional internship and trainee opportunity for aspiring final year law students and newly enrolled Advocates. This highly coveted internship  and trainee opportunity  is a paid position, providing a remarkable platform for career growth and experiential learning in a corporate environment. Eligibility: Only for final year Students and Newly Enrolled Advocates. We are offering a limited number of vacancies, designed for law students and newly enrolled advocates in the dynamic world of the legal profession. This is an immediate joining opportunity, available to candidates who are interested to work in the area of commercial and civil litigation and have interest towards drafting, and legal research. As a team member at  LEXIS AND COMPANY,  you will refine your research and drafting skills while witnessing the meticulous professional conduct expected

Physical Internship & Training Program - Legal (LEVEL - 1)

   Physical Internship & Training Program - Legal (LEVEL - 1) --- PLEASE READ THE COMPLETE JOB DESCRIPTION BEFORE APPLYING ---   Urgent Hiring for: LAW STUDENTS/CS STUDENTS/ FRESHER LAW GRADUATES/ FRESHER CS. Position: Physical Internship & Training Program - Legal (LEVEL - 1) Department: Legal. Firm Name: LEXIS AND COMPANY – LAW FIRM. Location: Janakpuri, New Delhi. CTC: RS 5000/- Per Month. Additional Allowance: All official expenses including travelling allowance for official purposes will be paid from the day 1 of the service with the firm.   We are urgently looking for LAW STUDENTS / CS STUDENTS / FRESHER LAW GRADUATES / FRESHER CS for the position of Physical Internship & Training Program - Legal (LEVEL - 1) for our Law Firm in Janakpuri, New Delhi.   Eligibility: Mandatory Qualification: Any LAW STUDENTS / CS STUDENTS / FRESHER LAW GRADUATES / FRESHER CS who wants to learn as a beginner. Desired Qualification: Any additional qualification  will be pre

The Doctrine of Alternative Danger

  THE DOCTRINE OF ALTERNATIVE DANGER Although the plaintiff is supposed to be cautious in spite of the defendant’s Negligence, there can also be certain situations when the plaintiff is justified in taking some threat where some unsafe state of affairs has been created by way of the defendant. The plaintiff may appear as puzzled or worried through a hazardous state of affairs created via the defendant and to store his man or woman or property, or now and again to store a third party from such danger, he may take a choice risk. The law, therefore, lets in the plaintiff to come across a choice danger to shop by himself from the chance created via the defendant. If the path adopted by him results in some harm to himself, his motion in opposition to the defendant will now not fail. The judgment of the plaintiff, however, is not rash. The position can be defined by means of the case of Jones v . Boyce . In that case, the plaintiff used to be a passenger in the defendant’s train and instruct