Skip to main content

Relationship between Rights and Duties - Manav Puri@LexCliq

 Relationship Between Rights and Duties 

By - Manav Puri@LexCliq


Introduction;

In India, privilege has been given to each person, including living with free liberty. However, these rights are enforceable only another person has some act that he will wish to do. Also, the citizens have the duty to shield the rights of another person living in society. Therefore, duty and rights go hand in hand with each other. Once there's a breach of duty from one person, there is a breach of the right of another person. “In the strict sense, legal rights are correlatives of legal duties and are outlined as interests whom the law protects by imposing corresponding duties on others. As citizens, we've got a spread of responsibilities that we tend to must fulfil in our daily lives. These responsibilities are owed to each the state and people. A duty is an obligatory act an individual should perform in favor of another person. If the person has broken his duty and infringed anyone right then he has to suffer consequences arisen from the breaching the right.


1. Rights and Duties invariably go along – Rights associated duties are closely connected and can't be separated from one another. each go facet by side. If the state provides the proper to life to a citizen, it also imposes an obligation on him to not expose his life to dangers, further on respect the lifetime of others. If I actually have a right to work and earn, it's also my duty to acknowledge identical right of others.

2. Duty of one is rights of Others – Rights may be enjoyed solely within the world of duties. for each right there is corresponding duty. Once the people fail to discharge their duties properly, the rights will become meaningless. “I will fancy my rights providing the others permit me to try and do identical. I have” the right to life and it's the duty of others to respect my life and to not cause any hurt to me.”


3. Rights of a subject additionally implies Duties for him – Rights aren't the monopoly of one individual. Everyone gets these equally and his implies that “others even have the same rights that I have, and it is my duty to examine that others also fancy their rights.” 

4. Rights are to be used for social good – Rights originate in society. Therefore, while enjoying rights, we should attempt to promote social interest. it's the duty of each one amongst us to use our rights for promoting the welfare of the society as a whole.

5. Duty towards the State – Since, state protects and enforces rights, it additionally becomes the duty of all people to be loyal to the state. it's their duty to adapt the laws of the state and to pay taxes honestly. The citizens should be able to defend the state. Thus, a subject has each Rights and Duties. He enjoys rights and performs his duties. Rights and Duties are the 2 sides of the same coin.


Conclusion;

During this light, it is very important to recollect Dr. B.R. Ambedkar’s statements within the Constituent Assembly, that said that the individual remains the essential unit of the Constitution. The argument and interpretation of the term “duties” ought to include the responsibilities of individuals in positions of authority. Others in positions of authority mustn't use their position to take advantage of those over whom they need control. we will solely raise people to execute their job once we have absolute to all the whole total of humanity, dignity, equality, and freedom provided by the Constitution. The responsibility of ‘following the tasks’ should be obligatory on voters only when securing humanity, dignity, equality, and freedom for all, as secure by the Constitution.


Author Name – Manav Puri@LexCliq


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Physical Internship & Training Program - Legal (LEVEL - 1)

   Physical Internship & Training Program - Legal (LEVEL - 1) --- PLEASE READ THE COMPLETE JOB DESCRIPTION BEFORE APPLYING ---   Urgent Hiring for: LAW STUDENTS/CS STUDENTS/ FRESHER LAW GRADUATES/ FRESHER CS. Position: Physical Internship & Training Program - Legal (LEVEL - 1) Department: Legal. Firm Name: LEXIS AND COMPANY – LAW FIRM. Location: Janakpuri, New Delhi. CTC: RS 5000/- Per Month. Additional Allowance: All official expenses including travelling allowance for official purposes will be paid from the day 1 of the service with the firm.   We are urgently looking for LAW STUDENTS / CS STUDENTS / FRESHER LAW GRADUATES / FRESHER CS for the position of Physical Internship & Training Program - Legal (LEVEL - 1) for our Law Firm in Janakpuri, New Delhi.   Eligibility: Mandatory Qualification: Any LAW STUDENTS / CS STUDENTS / FRESHER LAW GRADUATES / FRESHER CS who wants to learn as a beginner. Desired Qualification: Any additional qualification  will be pre

LAW INTERNSHIP AND TRAINEE OPPORTUNITY

  LAW INTERNSHIP AND TRAINEE OPPORTUNITY: LEXIS AND COMPANY, renowned for its excellence in the legal field, is thrilled to announce an exceptional internship and trainee opportunity for aspiring final year law students and newly enrolled Advocates. This highly coveted internship  and trainee opportunity  is a paid position, providing a remarkable platform for career growth and experiential learning in a corporate environment. Eligibility: Only for final year Students and Newly Enrolled Advocates. We are offering a limited number of vacancies, designed for law students and newly enrolled advocates in the dynamic world of the legal profession. This is an immediate joining opportunity, available to candidates who are interested to work in the area of commercial and civil litigation and have interest towards drafting, and legal research. As a team member at  LEXIS AND COMPANY,  you will refine your research and drafting skills while witnessing the meticulous professional conduct expected

The Doctrine of Alternative Danger

  THE DOCTRINE OF ALTERNATIVE DANGER Although the plaintiff is supposed to be cautious in spite of the defendant’s Negligence, there can also be certain situations when the plaintiff is justified in taking some threat where some unsafe state of affairs has been created by way of the defendant. The plaintiff may appear as puzzled or worried through a hazardous state of affairs created via the defendant and to store his man or woman or property, or now and again to store a third party from such danger, he may take a choice risk. The law, therefore, lets in the plaintiff to come across a choice danger to shop by himself from the chance created via the defendant. If the path adopted by him results in some harm to himself, his motion in opposition to the defendant will now not fail. The judgment of the plaintiff, however, is not rash. The position can be defined by means of the case of Jones v . Boyce . In that case, the plaintiff used to be a passenger in the defendant’s train and instruct