Skip to main content

Shaheen Bagh Case

 SHAHEEN BAGH CASE

The Shaheen Bagh protest started because of the Citizenship Amendment Act passed by the Parliament on December 12, 2019. This allowed citizenship to all the religious people except Muslims migrated from Pakistan, Bangladesh and Afghanistan on or before December 31, 2014. A Writ Petition was filed by the Indian Union Muslim League under Article 32 challenging the constitutionality of the CAA.

Protests against the CAA was started on December 15, 2019 at Shaheen Bagh with a few women and then attracted many people, which eventually led to the blockage of road and became inconvenient for the commuters to move through that place. Due to this blockage, many petitions were filed before the Courts. The SC decided to answer all these petitions through the case of Amit Sahni v. Commissioner of Police & Ors., which was initially filed in the Delhi High Court. The Delhi High Court left this issue with the Delhi Police. But, the situation did not change and through the Special Leave Petition, the Petitioner approached the Supreme Court.

In this case the appellant argued that the right to move freely within the territory of India of some people is violated due to the exercise of right to assemble peacefully without arms by some people. But, it is well established in the Article 19 (2) and Article 19 (3) of the Constitution that, the State can impose reasonable restrictions on the exercise of the right conferred by the said sub-clauses (a) & (b) in the interests of the sovereignty and integrity of India, the security of the State, friendly relations with foreign States, public order, decency or morality, or in relation to contempt of court, defamation or incitement to an offence.

Dissent and Democracy go hand in hand. So, it is ok to protest, but your exercise of right shall not curb others in exercise of their rights. To protest one needs to take permission from the administrative authorities. The Administrative authorities have to check where they are permitting the people to protest and will that permission can lead to any problem. Even if it is allowed to protest, whether such an act can be permitted for an indefinite period of time? So, the SC stated that it is the duty of the administration to control such an act, and they can impose reasonable restrictions on those who are protesting, such as shifting them to a suitable place, providing temporary reliefs, etc. In this case, the Administration has failed to do its duty properly, the SC had interfered. The Protest however subsided due to the Covid situation with the action taken by the Police. So, ones right to protest cannot interfere with the others right of mobility and it is the duty of the administration to manage it and the Constitution has already provided them with the powers to impose reasonable restrictions in such cases.


Shaheen Bagh Case by Velanati Jyothirmai @ Lex Cliq


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Physical Internship & Training Program - Legal (LEVEL - 1)

   Physical Internship & Training Program - Legal (LEVEL - 1) --- PLEASE READ THE COMPLETE JOB DESCRIPTION BEFORE APPLYING ---   Urgent Hiring for: LAW STUDENTS/CS STUDENTS/ FRESHER LAW GRADUATES/ FRESHER CS. Position: Physical Internship & Training Program - Legal (LEVEL - 1) Department: Legal. Firm Name: LEXIS AND COMPANY – LAW FIRM. Location: Janakpuri, New Delhi. CTC: RS 5000/- Per Month. Additional Allowance: All official expenses including travelling allowance for official purposes will be paid from the day 1 of the service with the firm.   We are urgently looking for LAW STUDENTS / CS STUDENTS / FRESHER LAW GRADUATES / FRESHER CS for the position of Physical Internship & Training Program - Legal (LEVEL - 1) for our Law Firm in Janakpuri, New Delhi.   Eligibility: Mandatory Qualification: Any LAW STUDENTS / CS STUDENTS / FRESHER LAW GRADUATES / FRESHER CS who wants to learn as a beginner. Desired Qualification: Any additional qualification  will be pre

LAW INTERNSHIP AND TRAINEE OPPORTUNITY

  LAW INTERNSHIP AND TRAINEE OPPORTUNITY: LEXIS AND COMPANY, renowned for its excellence in the legal field, is thrilled to announce an exceptional internship and trainee opportunity for aspiring final year law students and newly enrolled Advocates. This highly coveted internship  and trainee opportunity  is a paid position, providing a remarkable platform for career growth and experiential learning in a corporate environment. Eligibility: Only for final year Students and Newly Enrolled Advocates. We are offering a limited number of vacancies, designed for law students and newly enrolled advocates in the dynamic world of the legal profession. This is an immediate joining opportunity, available to candidates who are interested to work in the area of commercial and civil litigation and have interest towards drafting, and legal research. As a team member at  LEXIS AND COMPANY,  you will refine your research and drafting skills while witnessing the meticulous professional conduct expected

The Doctrine of Alternative Danger

  THE DOCTRINE OF ALTERNATIVE DANGER Although the plaintiff is supposed to be cautious in spite of the defendant’s Negligence, there can also be certain situations when the plaintiff is justified in taking some threat where some unsafe state of affairs has been created by way of the defendant. The plaintiff may appear as puzzled or worried through a hazardous state of affairs created via the defendant and to store his man or woman or property, or now and again to store a third party from such danger, he may take a choice risk. The law, therefore, lets in the plaintiff to come across a choice danger to shop by himself from the chance created via the defendant. If the path adopted by him results in some harm to himself, his motion in opposition to the defendant will now not fail. The judgment of the plaintiff, however, is not rash. The position can be defined by means of the case of Jones v . Boyce . In that case, the plaintiff used to be a passenger in the defendant’s train and instruct