Skip to main content

Surrogacy Bill

                             Surrogacy Bill

There is no second thought or doubt that women are exploited in the name of surrogacy. Their body are sometimes used for making babies for commercial purposes where women are also happy because they get money and obviously the person who is influencing the woman to be a surrogate mother is happy because now he or she can do whatever. In a layman’s language, commercial surrogacy refers to the kind of surrogacy where it is done for the financial benefits and also involves the compensation beyond the medical expenses and insurances at the time of pregnancy.

Lately, the government of India realized this by constant pressure from the women groups. They felt the need to stop the exploitation of women by introducing a progressive Bill which will regulate the Surrogacy in India with some more rules and regulations. In 2016, it was introduced in Lok Sabha named as Surrogacy (Regulation) Bill, 2016, but was blocked by the Rajya Sabha . In 2017, it mentioned some more changes which are progressive in nature to the old legislation creating, Surrogacy (Regulation) Bill, 2019. It pushed for providing more bodily autonomy to women where they can take up commercial surrogacy and get compensated for the same. The reason mentioned for that is the exploitation of women takes place because there is lack of regulatory oversight and legal protection to the surrogate. If that could be changed, then there is no problem for commercial surrogacy.

Now, the bill actually proposes to create a National Surrogacy Board which will be involved in policymaking at the central level. Further, there will also be State Surrogacy Boards and appropriate authorities which will act as executive bodies in the States in Union Territories. It also outlaws or put a stop to the commercial surrogacy and only allows for altruistic surrogacy which will involve no additional monetary compensation to the surrogate. 

Another clause mentioned in the bill requires the couples to be married for atleast 5 years if they opt for surrogacy. At the time of the surrogacy, they should possess a ‘certificate of essentiality’ that means they are proven to be infertile and are not able to produce babies. Also, the babies are not allowed to be used for sale, prostitution or other forms of exploitation.

Further, it specifies that the surrogacy can be opted by the heterosexual couple with a man ages of 26 and 55 years and a woman between the ages of 25 and 50 years. There should also be no other biological or adopted or surrogate children (unless the child is physically/ mentally challenged or has a life threatening disorder) with the couple. It mentions that the surrogate should be a close relative of the couple’s family, ages between 25 and 35 years of age.

Therefore, the key takeaway from the above stated facts is that the couple seeking child should be married for atleast 5 years and there is no place for commercial surrogacy that is the kind of surrogacy which involves additional monetary benefits apart from the medical expenses and insurance. It is not allowed and the person found doing that will be booked for the same and get imprisonment extending to 10 years and fine up to Rs. 10 lakh. So, the couple should avoid doing that and opt for altruistic surgery.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Physical Internship & Training Program - Legal (LEVEL - 1)

   Physical Internship & Training Program - Legal (LEVEL - 1) --- PLEASE READ THE COMPLETE JOB DESCRIPTION BEFORE APPLYING ---   Urgent Hiring for: LAW STUDENTS/CS STUDENTS/ FRESHER LAW GRADUATES/ FRESHER CS. Position: Physical Internship & Training Program - Legal (LEVEL - 1) Department: Legal. Firm Name: LEXIS AND COMPANY – LAW FIRM. Location: Janakpuri, New Delhi. CTC: RS 5000/- Per Month. Additional Allowance: All official expenses including travelling allowance for official purposes will be paid from the day 1 of the service with the firm.   We are urgently looking for LAW STUDENTS / CS STUDENTS / FRESHER LAW GRADUATES / FRESHER CS for the position of Physical Internship & Training Program - Legal (LEVEL - 1) for our Law Firm in Janakpuri, New Delhi.   Eligibility: Mandatory Qualification: Any LAW STUDENTS / CS STUDENTS / FRESHER LAW GRADUATES / FRESHER CS who wants to learn as a beginner. Desired Qualification: Any additional qualification  will be pre

LAW INTERNSHIP AND TRAINEE OPPORTUNITY

  LAW INTERNSHIP AND TRAINEE OPPORTUNITY: LEXIS AND COMPANY, renowned for its excellence in the legal field, is thrilled to announce an exceptional internship and trainee opportunity for aspiring final year law students and newly enrolled Advocates. This highly coveted internship  and trainee opportunity  is a paid position, providing a remarkable platform for career growth and experiential learning in a corporate environment. Eligibility: Only for final year Students and Newly Enrolled Advocates. We are offering a limited number of vacancies, designed for law students and newly enrolled advocates in the dynamic world of the legal profession. This is an immediate joining opportunity, available to candidates who are interested to work in the area of commercial and civil litigation and have interest towards drafting, and legal research. As a team member at  LEXIS AND COMPANY,  you will refine your research and drafting skills while witnessing the meticulous professional conduct expected

The Doctrine of Alternative Danger

  THE DOCTRINE OF ALTERNATIVE DANGER Although the plaintiff is supposed to be cautious in spite of the defendant’s Negligence, there can also be certain situations when the plaintiff is justified in taking some threat where some unsafe state of affairs has been created by way of the defendant. The plaintiff may appear as puzzled or worried through a hazardous state of affairs created via the defendant and to store his man or woman or property, or now and again to store a third party from such danger, he may take a choice risk. The law, therefore, lets in the plaintiff to come across a choice danger to shop by himself from the chance created via the defendant. If the path adopted by him results in some harm to himself, his motion in opposition to the defendant will now not fail. The judgment of the plaintiff, however, is not rash. The position can be defined by means of the case of Jones v . Boyce . In that case, the plaintiff used to be a passenger in the defendant’s train and instruct