Skip to main content


Filing a restraining order against someone who has filed one against you is a scenario that can occur in situations of mutual conflict or perceived threats between individuals. While the legal process for obtaining a restraining order varies by jurisdiction, it is generally possible for both parties involved in a dispute to seek restraining orders against each other under certain circumstances. However, the issuance of such orders depends on the specific facts of each case and the discretion of the court. Here's a detailed overview of the considerations involved:

  1. Legal Basis for Restraining Orders: Restraining orders, also known as protection orders or orders of protection, are legal documents issued by a court to protect individuals from harassment, threats, violence, or other forms of harm. They typically prohibit the restrained party from contacting, harassing, or coming within a certain distance of the protected party.

  2. Mutual Restraining Orders: In cases where both parties to a dispute claim to be victims of harassment, threats, or violence perpetrated by the other party, it is possible for each party to seek a restraining order against the other. This may occur in situations of domestic violence, harassment, stalking, or other forms of interpersonal conflict.

  3. Legal Requirements: To obtain a restraining order, individuals typically need to demonstrate to the court that they have a reasonable fear of harm or harassment from the other party. This may involve providing evidence such as witness statements, documentation of past incidents, or testimony detailing the nature of the threat or harassment.

  4. Court Evaluation: When both parties seek restraining orders against each other, the court will evaluate the evidence presented by each party and consider the totality of the circumstances in determining whether to grant the requested orders. The court may hold hearings where both parties have the opportunity to present their case and provide evidence supporting their claims.

  5. No Contact Orders: In some cases, the court may issue mutual restraining orders or no contact orders, prohibiting both parties from contacting or harassing each other. These orders are intended to maintain distance and prevent further escalation of conflict while legal proceedings or resolution efforts are ongoing.

  6. Modification or Dissolution: If both parties have obtained restraining orders against each other but later wish to modify or dissolve the orders, they may petition the court for such changes. The court will review the request and consider factors such as changes in circumstances, compliance with the orders, and any new evidence or developments in the case.

  7. Legal Representation: Given the complexity of restraining order proceedings and the potential consequences of such orders, individuals seeking restraining orders or responding to restraining order petitions may benefit from legal representation. Attorneys specializing in family law, domestic violence, or civil litigation, such as those at LEXIS AND COMPANY, can provide guidance, representation, and advocacy throughout the legal process.

In conclusion, it is possible to file a restraining order against someone who has filed one against you, particularly in cases of mutual conflict or perceived threats. The issuance of such orders depends on the evidence presented to the court and the evaluation of the specific circumstances of each case. Seeking legal assistance is advisable to navigate the legal process effectively and protect one's rights and safety. Contact LEXIS AND COMPANY at +91-9051112233 for expert legal guidance and representation in restraining order matters. Let us help you understand your options and pursue appropriate legal remedies. #RestrainingOrder #LegalProtection #MutualConflict #LexisAndCompany #CallForLegalAssistance


Popular posts from this blog


  LAW INTERNSHIP AND TRAINEE OPPORTUNITY: LEXIS AND COMPANY, renowned for its excellence in the legal field, is thrilled to announce an exceptional internship and trainee opportunity for aspiring final year law students and newly enrolled Advocates. This highly coveted internship  and trainee opportunity  is a paid position, providing a remarkable platform for career growth and experiential learning in a corporate environment. Eligibility: Only for final year Students and Newly Enrolled Advocates. We are offering a limited number of vacancies, designed for law students and newly enrolled advocates in the dynamic world of the legal profession. This is an immediate joining opportunity, available to candidates who are interested to work in the area of commercial and civil litigation and have interest towards drafting, and legal research. As a team member at  LEXIS AND COMPANY,  you will refine your research and drafting skills while witnessing the meticulous professional conduct expected

Physical Internship & Training Program - Legal (LEVEL - 1)

   Physical Internship & Training Program - Legal (LEVEL - 1) --- PLEASE READ THE COMPLETE JOB DESCRIPTION BEFORE APPLYING ---   Urgent Hiring for: LAW STUDENTS/CS STUDENTS/ FRESHER LAW GRADUATES/ FRESHER CS. Position: Physical Internship & Training Program - Legal (LEVEL - 1) Department: Legal. Firm Name: LEXIS AND COMPANY – LAW FIRM. Location: Janakpuri, New Delhi. CTC: RS 5000/- Per Month. Additional Allowance: All official expenses including travelling allowance for official purposes will be paid from the day 1 of the service with the firm.   We are urgently looking for LAW STUDENTS / CS STUDENTS / FRESHER LAW GRADUATES / FRESHER CS for the position of Physical Internship & Training Program - Legal (LEVEL - 1) for our Law Firm in Janakpuri, New Delhi.   Eligibility: Mandatory Qualification: Any LAW STUDENTS / CS STUDENTS / FRESHER LAW GRADUATES / FRESHER CS who wants to learn as a beginner. Desired Qualification: Any additional qualification  will be pre

The Doctrine of Alternative Danger

  THE DOCTRINE OF ALTERNATIVE DANGER Although the plaintiff is supposed to be cautious in spite of the defendant’s Negligence, there can also be certain situations when the plaintiff is justified in taking some threat where some unsafe state of affairs has been created by way of the defendant. The plaintiff may appear as puzzled or worried through a hazardous state of affairs created via the defendant and to store his man or woman or property, or now and again to store a third party from such danger, he may take a choice risk. The law, therefore, lets in the plaintiff to come across a choice danger to shop by himself from the chance created via the defendant. If the path adopted by him results in some harm to himself, his motion in opposition to the defendant will now not fail. The judgment of the plaintiff, however, is not rash. The position can be defined by means of the case of Jones v . Boyce . In that case, the plaintiff used to be a passenger in the defendant’s train and instruct