LEXIS AND COMPANY

 ARTICLE 38 AND 39 OF THE INDIAN CONSTITUTION INTRODUCTION INDIAN CONSTITUTION AND ITS PREABLE TALKS ABOUT SOCIALIST WHICH IS THE BASIS OF THE DEVOLOPMENT OF SOCIAL STRUCTURE IN THE NATION . SOCIALISM MEANS SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT AND INCLUSION OF ALL THE VARIED SECTIONS OF THE SOCIETY WHICH WILL CONTRIBUTE FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF THOSE AND TO INCLUDE THEM IN THE MAINSTREAM STRATA . ARTICLE 39 OF THE CONSTITUTION LAYS DOWN SIX DIRECTIVE PRINCIPLES THAT FOCUS ON ENSURING EAQUAL MEANS OF LIVELIHOOD TO THE PEOPLE OF THE NATION . ARTICLE 39A WHICH WAS INDUCED THROUGH AN AMENDAMENT ACT OF 1976 PROPOSED A MANDATE FOR THE STATE TO TO PROVIDE JUSTICE AND FREE LEGAL AID TO THE PEOPLE . SCOPE OF ARTICLE 39 A WHICH PROVIDES FOR FREE LEGAL AID BY THE STATE TO ENSURE JUSTICE TO THE PEOPLE , THE ARTICLE IN ITS PREROGATIVE TALKS ABOUT THE REASONABLE , FREE AND VALUABLE JUSTICE , ANY DENIAL TO THIS WILL LEAD TO THE QUESTIONS UNDER ARTICLE 21 OF THE CONSTITUTION . ARTICLE 21 WHICH TALKS ABOUT RIGHT TO LIFE T

                                  INDIAN  LEGAL  PROFESSION  INDIA IS AMONG THOSE NATIONS OF THE WORLD WHERE THERE IS A RISING NUMBER OF ADVOCATES WHO ARE KEEN TO PROVIDE FOR THEIR PART FOR THE DEVELOPMENT IN THE FIELD AND CONTRIBUTE ON THEIR PASRT FOR INCLUSION AND JUSTICE SYSTEM . INDIAN ADVOCATES ARE USUALLY COLLECTIVELY CALLED AS WAQEEL SAHAB THERE IS AN INCREASING CRAZE AMONG THE PEOPLE REGARDING THE BLACK COAT AND THE BAR COUNCIL REGISTRATION WHICH DEFINES A PERSONS CHANCES OF BEING A SUCCESFUL LAWYERS OR ADVOCATES, THE LAW THAT GOVERNS THE ADVOCATES IN THE NATION IS THE ADVOCATES ACT 1961 , INDIA IS AMONG THOSE NATIONS WHERE THE CRAZE FOR THE FIELD IS RISING RAPIDLY AND SEES NO END INM THE NEAR FUTURE . INDIA IS THE NATION OF OVER A BILLION OF PEOPLE NEEDS TTO BE A SPECIAL PLACE TO DEVELOP AS A LAWYER AS IT IS A FIELD OF PERSEVARENCE AND HARDWORK , INDIANS ARE KNOWN FOR THEIR GROWTH WITH HARDWORK WHICH IS WHAT IS KEEPING THE NATIONS LAWYERS AND LAW PROFESSION ALIVE .  LEGAL PROF

  An Arrested Person's Rights By Shagun Mahendroo 1 - The right to know why you were arrested. Article 22(1) of the Indian Constitution states that no police officer may detain or arrest a person without first informing the accused of the basis for his detention or arrest. According to Section 50 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), every police officer who has the authority to arrest someone without a warrant must inform the person being arrested of the offence for which he is being arrested, as well as any other necessary grounds for the arrest. This is a police officer's obligation, which he cannot decline. The person/police official arresting a person is required by Section 50A of the CrPC to tell any of his relatives or acquaintances who may have an interest in the arrest. In circumstances where a police official authorises his junior to arrest a person without a warrant, Section 55 of the CrPC mandates that the arrested person must be notified of the order of delegat

  DOCTRINE OF EFFECTIVE NATIONALITY Right of a refugee (right of individual) to enter into a nation Statelessness of an Individual – International Law: The intimate relation between individual and state, recognized by international law, is apparent from the rules on diplomatic protection, but authoritative exposition of the nature of nationality on the international plane has lately elaborated that relation. The need for certain links between an individual and a state as a basis for conferring nationality was emphasized by various members of the International Law Commission in the debates on elimination and reduction of statelessness. The final development of this work was the adoption by a United Nations Conference in 1961 of a Convention on Reduction of Statelessness, which rests conferment, renunciation, and deprivation of nationality on various social links between individual and state. In its judgment in the Nottebohm Case, the International Court of Justice expounded the principl

  DELHI RIOTS After the Citizenship Amendment was passed in the Parliament, a widespread criticism was faced all over the country. Some of the politicians arranged made speeches at the gathering against Anti-CAA protestors, instigating them to the attacks against them. This led to the attacks and riots against many Muslims in the Delhi. The Pro-CAA protesters led attacks against Anti-CAA protestors after inspiring from the speeches of the politicians. No politician came to stop the riots. Many mosques, madrasahs, houses, and shops belonging to Muslims were burnt, destroyed and robbed. Many Muslims were killed and some went missing. Many of the Muslims in the riot hit area were terrified and some of them, even evacuated their residences and settled at different places. There was no immediate police action, which resulted in this severe loss. Even after the CM of Delhi, Arvind Kejriwal, ordered Police to take action, they failed to do so. Thus, Army had to intervene to resolve the issue.

  AI in law Artificial Intellect (AI) is the machine-led intelligence that enables computers to perform tasks considerably more quickly than humans. It is also known as machine learning. Specifically, it is concerned with the discipline of computer science that has made it substantially easier for key activities to be completed in the blink of an eye. Artificial Intelligence and the Law: Artificial intelligence (AI) is currently one of the most talked-about issues in the world of technology. Recent advances in artificial intelligence have resulted in a significant increase in research and development across a wide range of subjects, including law. In today's world, most individuals are familiar with the phrase Artificial Intelligence (AI). AI systems are made up of a number of different components, starting with a control unit that receives and processes input and progressing to a processing component that makes decisions based on the information received. The concept of a human-li

  Unlawful deprivation of a man's liberty When a man's liberty is wrongfully restricted, he may bring a civil action against the person who did it under the heading Trespass to Person, or more particularly under the heading false imprisonment under the law of torts. Let us first consider what is meant by the term "false imprisonment." In the words of Winfield, false incarceration might be described as the imposition of a total restraint for a length of time, however brief, upon the liberty of a person. When a man's liberty is wrongfully restricted, he may bring a civil action against the person who did it under the heading Trespass to Person, or more particularly under the heading false imprisonment under the law of torts. Let us first consider what is meant by the term "false imprisonment." Defining false incarceration according to Winfield, it can be described as the imposition of a total limit on another's liberty for any period of time, however b